Although reports from VAERS (vaccine adverse events reporting system) show a significant amount of people, especially adolescents and young adults, being diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis, governments in many parts of the world still continue to its vaccination program through the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to the CDC’s website last updated September 8, 2021:
“Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. In both cases, the body’s immune system causes inflammation in response to an infection or some other trigger.”
The CDC also stated that cases of myocarditis have occurred following the injection of Pfizer-BioNTech and/or Moderna’s mRNA COVID19 vaccines, more often after the second dose and usually within several days after vaccination. They also listed the symptoms which include “chest pain, shortness of breath, and feeling of having a fast-beating, fluttering, and pounding heart”. The CDC also recommends seeking medical care when having any of these symptoms, especially if it’s “within a week after COVID-19 vaccination”. The “initial evaluation may include an ECG, a troponin level and tests for inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate”. On that same advisory, ironically, the CDC still recommends getting the jab despite learning that these cases occur.
In June of this year, health officials from the US also “have verified 226 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis in people ages 30 and younger” after receiving the shots and that “the rates for ages 16-24 following a second dose are above what is expected”. They also added that they are investigating about 250 more reports.
Given these facts, people wonder if the CDC, along with other health agencies, is reporting the whole data about myocarditis and pericarditis or even the whole truth about reports of adverse reactions. The clear answer, according to scientific evidence, is no. They are not telling the truth about everything. For example, in his Twitter post, Dr. Anthony Hinton, “Consultant Surgeon with 30 years of experience in the NHS”, pointed out that myocarditis “has a 20% fatality rate after 2 years and a 50% fatality rate after 5 years”. He claimed that it is not mild as it results in “2 in 10 people dead after 2 years and 5 in 10 after 5 years”.
Meanwhile, regarding the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) conflicts of interest and other adverse effects of mRNA shots, America’s Frontline Doctors (AFD) has posted an article by Toby Rogers. In this piece published on October 26, 2021, Rogers explains the following:
“The risk-benefit model created by the FDA only looks at one known harm from the Pfizer mRNA shot — myocarditis. But we know that the real-world harms from the Pfizer mRNA shot go well beyond myocarditis and include anaphylaxis, Bell’s Palsy, heart attack, thrombocytopenia/ low platelet, permanent disability, shingles, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to name a few. Cancer, diabetes, endocrine disruption, and autoimmune disorders may show up later. But the FDA does not care about any of that because they have a vaccine to sell so they just ignore all of those factors in their model.”
Another very important revelation by Rogers is what follows. He explained why the FDA and Pfizer’s reports are not reliable as it deliberately cheat the public by ignoring many important parts and how these two entities use wrong data. As Rogers continues:
“There were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 in the clinical trial of children ages 5 to 11. So Pfizer and the FDA just ignored all of the actual health outcomes (they had to, there is no emergency, so the application is moot). INSTEAD Pfizer switched to looking at antibodies in the blood. In general, antibodies are a poor predictor of immunity. And the antibodies in the blood of these 5 to 11 year old children tell us nothing because again, there were zero cases of severe COVID-19 in this study (none in the treatment group, none in the control group). So Pfizer had to get creative! What they came up with is “immuno-bridging”.
Pfizer looked at the level of antibodies in the bloodwork of another study, this one involving people 16 to 25 years old, figured out the level of antibodies that seems to be protective in that population, then figured out how many kids ages 5 to 11 had similar levels of antibodies in their blood, and then came up with a number for how many cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths would be prevented by this shot in the 5 to 11 population in the future, based on the antibody levels and health outcomes from the 16 to 25 year old population. If your head hurts from that tortured logic, it should, because such chicanery is unprecedented in a risk-benefit analysis.”
Therefore, Toby Rogers concluded:
“The Pfizer vaccine fails any honest risk-benefit assessment in connection with its use in children ages 5 to 11. The FDA’s risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine in children ages 5 to 11 is shoddy. It used tortured logic (that would be rejected by any proper academic journal) in order to reach a predetermined result that is not based in science. The FDA briefing document is a work of fiction and it must be withdrawn immediately. If the FDA continues with this grotesque charade it will cause irreparable harms to children and the FDA leadership will one day be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.”
To read Toby Rogers’ full article, go to this link: